Thursday, May 22, 2014

Google storage is faster than s3

In a previous post I looked at the potential for cloud storage to serve as a web application's datastore, and found s3's performance to be quite adequate for that purpose. I was then curious to compare the performance of s3 with that of Google storage.

The crude benchmarks I ran showed Google storage to be much faster, with the difference particularly dramatic for reads where Google's optimizations were evident, running an order of magnitude faster than comparably sized writes. s3 also shows superior performance for reads over writes, but the difference is much smaller. Google storage's performance is superior across the board, and for small data sizes, even Google storage writes were faster than s3 reads of any size.

rate/stop typestorage typehost typechunk size
46.50.02readgsgcesmall
36.00.03readgsgcemedium
20.50.05readgsgcelarge
10.30.10reads3ec2small
10.20.10reads3ec2medium
6.10.16writegsgcesmall
5.40.18writegsgcemedium
5.20.19writes3ec2small
4.50.22writes3ec2medium
4.50.22writegsgcelarge
4.30.23reads3ec2large
2.90.35writes3ec2large

No comments:

Post a Comment